On Track – Issue 2

On Track
Issue 2  ·  April 2026  ·  IPM Team
Do you have one workplan — or three?
Why the most common scheduling mistake at MCAs is trying to make one document serve every audience.

Schedule management is the area where MCA programs struggle most visibly — and most silently. Workplans go stale, get updated only before status calls, or try to serve everyone from MCC leadership to the intervention sites. The result is a document no one trusts and no one owns. IPM has developed a structured scheduling strategy, grounded in the PPMM, that addresses these problems by starting with a simple insight: there is no single “the workplan.” Different audiences need different schedule products.

From the Field
IPM Strategy · April 2026
Three levels. Three audiences. One architecture.

IPM’s new Schedule Management Strategy identifies five failure modes that have historically undermined scheduling across MCC programs: tool conflation (mixing FIDIC contractor programmes with MCA workplans), top-down ownership, psychological safety barriers, phase complexity, and staff apathy. The fix is structural: stop treating the workplan as a single document and instead build three distinct schedule products.

Level 1 — Program Milestone Map: a compact-level view for MCC/MCA management and the MCA Board, updated quarterly, tracking major milestones like EIF, key awards, and compact closure.

Level 2 — Project Workplan: the PPMM-based, MS Project schedule owned by the MCA project manager, updated monthly and re-forecast quarterly through the QIP cycle.

Level 3 — Contractor Construction Programme: the FIDIC contractor’s detailed programme, owned by the contractor. The MCA monitors it — it does not build or maintain it. Getting this distinction right resolves much of the historical confusion.


Tool in Focus
The QIP: Your Schedule’s Heartbeat

The Quarterly Implementation Plan — PPMM Step 9 — is the mechanism that keeps schedules alive. It breaks each quarter into six two-week sprints where the team selects priority work packages, self-assigns ownership, and reviews progress every two weeks. This rhythm creates natural moments to update the schedule, flag problems early, and re-forecast without waiting for a crisis.

A critical principle embedded in the strategy: a re-forecast is not an admission of failure. The original baseline is fixed and changed only through formal change control. Updated expected finish dates — re-forecasts — are encouraged and should be entered freely. Separating the two reduces the anxiety of keeping the schedule honest, and honest schedules are the only ones worth having.

Three things to take from the IPM scheduling approach
1
Separate the products. A program milestone map, a project workplan, and a contractor construction programme are three different documents for three different audiences. Combining them creates a tool that serves no one well.
2
Make the team the owner. A schedule the team builds together — through the WBS workshop and self-assigned QIP sprints — is a schedule the team will actually maintain. Top-down schedules built for compliance get treated like compliance.
3
Reward honesty, not optimism. When an MCA shares a schedule showing delays, the first response should be “What do you need?” — not “Why is this late?” An honest schedule that shows problems is more valuable than a polished one that hides them.
New from IPM
🌐
IPM Hub — ipm4dev.org
All IPM resources in one place: the PPMM, FIDIC tools, training courses, procurement templates, practice tests, and the On Track newsletter archive. Bookmark it and share it with your team.
Visit ipm4dev.org →
🎓
New Training: Being an Effective Employer Under FIDIC 1999
A 10-part video series covering the Employer’s role, obligations, payment cycles, variations, safeguards compliance, disputes, and more — built specifically for MCA staff working under MCC Particular Conditions.
Watch the series →
Read the full PPMM — and put it to work.

The PPMM covers schedule management and nine other project management areas designed for MCC programs. Download it and see what your team could be doing differently — or reach out to IPM to talk through how to apply it to your program.

Download the PPMM →
Questions or ideas for a future issue? Contact the IPM Team:
tkachm@mcc.gov  ·  ipm4dev.org
Next issue: Change Management — keeping scope, schedule, and contracts aligned.

Leave a comment